Minnie Dlamini, one of South Africa’s most recognizable TV personalities, has filed a R2.5 million lawsuit against podcaster MacG. The case, which will be heard in the Equality Court, has generated major public interest. But what exactly is the Equality Court, and why is this lawsuit so significant?
This explainer breaks down the case, the legal framework behind it, and what’s at stake for both parties.
MacG’s ‘Podcast and Chill’ Dropped by DStv Following Controversy; Fans Rally in Support
1. What triggered the Equality Court case?
Minnie Dlamini alleges that MacG made defamatory comments during one of his Podcast and Chill episodes, which she believes damaged her reputation and caused emotional distress.
The statements reportedly suggested personal misconduct and, according to Dlamini’s legal team, violated her dignity and equality rights protected under South African law.
2. What is the Equality Court?
The Equality Court is a special South African court designed to handle cases involving unfair discrimination, hate speech, and harassment. It is accessible to anyone who feels their constitutional rights have been violated.
Unlike traditional civil courts, the Equality Court focuses on protecting dignity and equality and can issue remedies beyond just financial compensation, including public apologies and corrective orders.
3. What is Minnie Dlamini seeking in damages?
Dlamini is claiming R2.5 million in damages. This amount is intended to compensate for harm to her reputation, emotional suffering, and the broader impact of the alleged defamation.
The court could award the full amount, a portion of it, or issue a different form of remedy, depending on the evidence presented.
4. What does MacG’s defence look like?
At this stage, MacG’s legal team is expected to argue either that the statements were:
- Not defamatory
- True and in the public interest
- Or fall under fair comment, a legal defence that protects opinions expressed without malice.
MacG has not publicly commented extensively on the case, though his supporters argue the podcast is often controversial and pushes boundaries on purpose.
5. How could this impact both parties?
- For Minnie Dlamini: A win could vindicate her and set a precedent for protecting public figures from online defamation.
- For MacG: A loss could result in a substantial payout and could impact the way his podcast addresses sensitive topics.
This case could also shape how South African courts handle defamatory or harmful content in the digital age.
Unlock Exclusive Content!
Subscribe to the Pondoland Times weekly newsletter for trusted alerts on SASSA payments, NSFAS funding, and breaking local news. Get exclusive interviews, community features, and verified stories you can rely on—delivered straight to your inbox.
