A protest march against illegal immigration, dubbed the “March in March,” took place in Durban on Monday, drawing significant attention across the country. The event was organised by Jacinta Zuma, a media personality from Vuma FM in uMhlanga, and aimed at raising concerns over the growing number of undocumented foreigners entering South Africa.
Zuma firmly rejected claims that the march was xenophobic or politically motivated.
“There’s nothing xenophobic about this march, and it is not politically driven,” she said.
“The main reason for this action is the influx of illegal immigrants into the country. We are witnessing the growing damage and burden that it places on citizens.”
Zuma further voiced concern about the timing of government action around elections, suggesting that real issues affecting South Africans are often overlooked until votes are needed.
“It feels like the election has already taken place,” she added. “We know many of the things that citizens are complaining about will only be addressed around election time, but right now, it’s ordinary citizens who deal with the daily struggles of people entering the country undocumented.”
Government Response
The Ministry of Police, led by Minister Senzo Mchunu, expressed support for the march’s constitutional right to protest but urged participants to remain calm and respectful of the law.
“The safety of all citizens, regardless of their nationality, is our priority,” Mchunu said.
“We encourage all concerned individuals and communities to continue engaging with law enforcement in a constructive manner.”
He reaffirmed that the South African Police Service (SAPS) will continue to intensify its operations to protect the public and ensure that immigration laws are upheld.
“We must ensure that any public demonstrations remain peaceful and free from violence or intimidation,” Mchunu stressed.
The march has ignited renewed national conversation about immigration control, service delivery, and social cohesion. While some have welcomed the protest as a necessary platform for citizens to voice frustrations, others warn against the potential for such movements to blur the lines between civic activism and discrimination.
