The Regional Court in Thaba Nchu has sentenced 43-year-old repeat offender Thapelo Johannes Ntoagae to life imprisonment without the possibility of parole for raping a 4-year-old girl.
What Happened
The assault occurred on 8 October 2023, when Ntoagae lured the child into his shack. The victim’s mother raised the alarm after being unable to find her daughter. A neighbour reported seeing Ntoagae with the child, leading to the girl being located and taken to hospital. Doctors confirmed signs of forceful penetration, and the matter was immediately reported to police.
Although DNA evidence was not available and the child could not testify because of her age, the state relied on medical findings and a Victim Impact Statement facilitated by Court Preparation Officer Dipuo Sephapo to secure a conviction.
Official Response
Senior Public Prosecutor Ntai Letaba highlighted Ntoagae’s history of violence against women and children. He was previously convicted of attempted sexual assault in 2002 and sexual assault in 2008, serving 20 years before being released on parole. The court ruled that his repeated offences left no option but a life sentence without parole.
The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) praised the prosecution team and investigators for their meticulous work. “This sentence reinforces the fight against gender-based violence, especially against children. It reflects the NPA’s commitment to justice and protecting vulnerable members of society,” the authority said.
Community Impact
The judgment has been welcomed by the community as a tough stance against repeat offenders in South Africa’s ongoing struggle with gender-based violence (GBV). Parents and local leaders say the case underscores the urgent need to protect children and ensure harsher consequences for those who repeatedly target them.
FAQ
Who is the offender?
Thapelo Johannes Ntoagae, 43, previously convicted in 2002 and 2008 for srape-related crimes.
What was the sentence?
Life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
Why was it significant?
The case shows that even without DNA evidence, strong circumstantial evidence and victim support statements can lead to justice.
