This Content is for Subscribers Only
The Public Service Commission (PSC) has responded to claims made by Police Portfolio Committee Chairperson Ian Cameron. He alleged that the commission refused to probe criminal allegations against General Mbotho.
The PSC explained that it reviewed the case within its constitutional mandate and referred the criminal aspect to the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID). The directorate is the only body legally empowered to handle criminal allegations involving SAPS members.
According to the PSC, its role is set out in sections 195 and 196 of the Constitution. These provisions allow the commission to investigate personnel and administrative practices within the public service but not criminal matters.
Official Response
In its official statement, the PSC outlined the steps it took regarding General Mbotho’s case:
- Recruitment Process: The PSC reviewed the appointment process followed by the Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations (DPCI) and found no irregularities.
- Integrity Checks: It examined reports on integrity assessments and discovered no evidence of wrongdoing.
- Disciplinary Action: The commission confirmed that General Mbotho had faced internal disciplinary measures for sharing explicit content on a SAPS work WhatsApp group. He received a final written warning that expired after six months, as per SAPS labour policy.
- Harassment Allegations: The PSC interviewed SAPS members under Mbotho’s supervision and found no proof supporting the claims of harassment or intimidation.
The commission said these findings demonstrate that it has fulfilled its constitutional duties and acted appropriately on the matter.
Community Impact
The PSC’s statement comes amid growing public concern about accountability and ethics within the police service. By clarifying its position, the commission aims to strengthen public confidence and underline its commitment to transparent governance.
